Jon Huntsman Can't Campaign in Iowa, But He Can Be Seen on a Harley
Maureen Dowd on Saudi Women "It would have been thrilling, of course, if Hillary Clinton had channeled Aaron Sorkin and smacked around the barbaric Saudi men who force women to huddle under a suffocating black tarp," The New York Times' Maureen Dowd writes. "It would have been thrilling if Hillary 2011 had simply channeled Hillary 1995, when, as first lady, she made her bodacious speech in Beijing, declaring that "women's rights are human rights.'" But Dowd notes that "Clinton is a diplomat now. She knows it's tricky to push Bedouins, who get stubborn and dig in their heels...Still," she continues, "because the Saudis are our drug dealers on oil, America has never fought hard enough for oppressed women in the authoritarian kingdom." A smiling Michelle Obama and her daughters meeting with Nelson Mandela was a vivid reminder of how far South Africa has come since it ended race apartheid under pressure. The small courageous spurt of ladies in black driving was a vivid reminder that Saudi Arabia, under little pressure, is still locked in gender apartheid."
Nelson Lichtenstein on Wal-Mart's Authoritarian Culture Nelson Lichtenstein argues at The New York Times that "the sex discrimination at Wal-Mart that drove the recent suit is the product not merely of managerial bias and prejudice, but also of a corporate culture and business model that sustains it, rooted in the company's very beginnings." He explains that "a patriarchal ethos was written into the Wal-Mart DNA," encouraging the men of West Arkansas, where the store was founded in the 1950s, and their wives, to come and work. And though the company argues that argued that its sex discrimination "is now ancient history," Lichtenstein explains simply that "the patriarchy of old has been reconfigured into a more systematically authoritarian structure." The company makes it virtually impossible for the woman of Wal-Mart to accept a managerial position even if they were offered one, as almost anyone promoted to manager is required to transfer stores and towns. "For young men in a hurry, that's an inconvenience; for middle-aged women caring for families, this corporate reassignment policy amounts to sex discrimination." The extensive hours required by store managers are also such that "women with family resonsibilities would balk at such demands." Lichtenstien points out that unionizing is typically the way employees avoid such treatment as the Wal-Mart women have experienced, but Wal-Mart, of course, is anti-union.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
cdickson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
Caitlin Dickson
Get Five Best Columns in your inbox each morning. (preview)
| Related Articles | More by Caitlin Dickson | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have a story we missed? A link we have to click? A sharp opinion about the news? Instead of waiting for us to post it, tell us on the Open Wire.
Submit your news and ideas | See all reader posts
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register