It's natural, if not inevitable, that media coverage of Haiti takes an American perspective. (See: the debate over U.S. missionaries' motives
for trying to take Haitian orphans, and whether U.S. journalists are slowing
Haiti's recovery.) So what if we take it one step further, and put an American perspective on the disaster itself?
At Change.org, Te-Ping Chen
offers a thought exercise. Posing the question, "What if Haiti's earthquake hit the U.S.?" she envisions an alternative history, where America suffers a proportionate degree of damage:
The quake has killed nearly 3% of Haiti, injured another 4%, and displaced over 6% of the population... If the U.S. faced a similar catastrophe, it would be as though the entire state of North Carolina -- some 9 million people -- was wiped out... And in the quake's aftermath, the entire population of Florida would have started roaming up the United States' eastern seaboard, homeless and displaced.
Of course, as David Brooks
and other commentators
have argued, Haiti's poverty and infrastructure contributed to the scale of the disaster. So what would it look like if, as Chen asks, "Haiti's earthquake hit the U.S.?"
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
bcarlson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.