On Thursday, the Telegraph ran an
incredible story: back in the '50s, an entire French village suddenly went mad. This was
not, as previously thought, due to an ergot (fungus) contamination of the village
baker's bread, says investigative journalist H P Albarelli Jr., who
published a book on the subject. Instead, it was part of the
CIA's secret mind-control experiments with LSD. In other words, the CIA put a French
village on acid. The Telegraph story by Henry Samuel reported
Albarelli's argument.
Sound too fantastical for truth? It may
be: some bloggers and one U.S. historian are crying foul, saying the
Telegraph story was (a) slanted, (b) uncomfortably similar to other reports, and (c)
bizarrely old--Albarelli's book was published in 2008, so it's hardly breaking news. What's going on? Here's the debate:
- 'Harebrained' France 24's Christophe Josset runs the CIA idea by Cornell historian Steven Kaplan, who specializes in French bread history and has written his own book about the village insanity incident. "It's clinically incoherent," Kaplan
responds.
LSD takes effects in just a few hours, whereas
the inhabitants showed symptoms only after 36 hours or more.
Furthermore, LSD does not cause the digestive ailments or the
vegetative effects described by the townspeople. ... As for pulverising
it [for ingestion through the air], that technology was not even
possible at that time. Most compellingly, why would they choose the
town of Pont-Saint-Esprit to conduct these tests? It was half-destroyed
by the US Army during fighting with the Germans in the Second World
War. It makes no sense.
- Plagiarized? Global Dashboard's David Steven
wonders why the Telegraph story didn't even bother to cite Kaplan's
competing book on the subject. He also digs up what looks like some startling similarities: "parts of [the Telegraph article]
bear an extremely suspicious resemblance" to a New York Times review of
Kaplan's book back in 2008, while another section almost looks like a
direct translation of a French blog post from this past Monday. He lays
the quotes side by side for comparison.
- Chemically Laughable The Awl's Alex Balk (whose primary reaction is "really?") digs up a post by a chemist in the pharmaceutical industry, Derek Lowe.
Lowe says the Telegraph story is hogwash. He's particularly skeptical of a passage saying the village went crazy because of "diethylamide, the
D in LSD." Diethylamide "isn't a separate compound," and "LSD isn't
some sort of three-component mixture," Lowe scoffs: "I'd like to hear
this guy explain to me what the 'S' stands for." Furthermore,
diethylamides don't provoke hallucination. It's clear to him that "neither the author of this new book, nor the people at the Telegraph, nor the supposed scientific 'source' of this quote, know anything about chemistry." He's not
dismissing this wild story out of hand, but he doesn't think this
particular narrative makes sense:
Now, there most certainly
were secret LSD experiments during the 1950s and 1960s. (The book
Storming Heaven has a good account of them, as well as of the history
of LSD in general). But it's rather hard to see why the CIA should
decide to dose some village in the Auvergne, especially when the
symptoms (burning sensations in the extremities as well as
hallucinations) seem to match ergotism quite well.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
hhorn at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register