- Classic Luddite Argument, sneers Matthew Ingram at Gigaom: "'Going viral' has never been a more appropriate metaphor... It seems to be human nature to take whatever new social behavior or technology happens to be popular and associate that with everything bad that occurs — even if those bad things have been happening forever."
- So Many Problems With This Conclusion, writes Jason Kincaid at TechCrunch: "For one, the articles in question say that the number of Syphilis infections in the English town of Teesside has grown to a whopping thirty cases in 2009 (up from a mere ten cases the previous year). Sure, that’s a big jump percentage-wise, but the small sample size and the complete lack of details about any of these studies makes the conclusion that Facebook can somehow be linked to Syphilis extremely dubious...This sounds more like an observation based on a small number of cases rather than an established trend, and it doesn’t say anything about causation."
- Actually the Study Makes a Modest Point, writes Michael Kulrfeld at The Next Web: "Now Facebook won’t sneak into your room at night and inject you with Syphilis, but the data is sensible in a way: people on social networks sometimes use them to find casual sex. And unprotected casual sex is a fantastic way of getting an STD. So just think of Facebook as a vector to a vector."
- It's Not an Absurd Idea, writes the social media-friendly blogger Jennifer Van Grove at Mashable: "With 400 million members now spanning the world, it does make sense that more hookups would happen with Facebook as the facilitator and go-between."
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
jhudson at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
John Hudson



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register