Scientific American writes that halfalogues "make for dissonant eavesdropping because they are unpredictable. The less information we glean from a conversation, the harder our brains work to make sense of what we hear and the more difficult it is to stop listening." They also "demand more of our attention than dialogues and decrease our performance on other cognitive tasks—whether we are sitting at a computer in the lab, trying to read on the subway or driving a car."
No word yet on when the "halfalogue defense" will first be used at trial.
Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments
or send an email to the author at
rgustini at theatlantic dot com.
You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire.
Ray Gustini



User Comments
Please type your comment and click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be prompted to log in or register