In meetings in Los Angeles recently, Apple executives told their music industry counterparts that they had serious doubts about whether Spotify's business model could ever generate significant revenues or profits, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions... They noted that it's tough to sell something that someone else is giving away, the sources said. One industry insider said it is only logical that if Spotify were allowed to launch a free-music service here, at a time when Nielsen recently reported that the growth of digital sales has flattened out, it could eat into the businesses of proven revenue-producers.If Apple goes through with its subscription services, how could this affect Spotify and the music industry in general?
- Ultimately, Apple Wants to Block Out the Competition, writes Frederico Viticci at Mac Stories:
Apple wants to launch a music subscription service with cloud access and they don’t want Spotify to get in the way. They’ve probably been calling some labels to tell them about Steve’s “better, more secure” plans, and to remind them that, in the end, you can’t trust Europeans. That’s how they roll: Steve Jobs saved the music industry. Labels owe him one. Even though music downloads have slowed down over the last year, labels are ready to believe in Jobs’ plan once again...
When it comes to business it’s never about who’s wrong or right. Spotify is playing its own game (or maybe they’re learning how to play in a new field) and Apple wants to keep labels close, and competition far away from them. The music industry has always been a huge mess, and now that tech companies have joined the mess it has become an even more complicated affair.
- Spotify Could Still Break Through, writes Darrell Etherington at Gigaom: "If Spotify is willing to pay big royalties for content up front, chances are music labels will allow them entry into the market. Rumors are circulating that Spotify will be part of Windows Phone 7 launch coming early next week. If it does come that soon, though, it’ll probably only offer a limited catalogue."
- Record Labels Want Spotify to Charge Users, explains Jason Ankeny at Fierce Mobile Content: "While the majority of Spotify users tune in to a free, ad-supported version of the service, BusinessWeek reported
in mid-June that the four majors--Universal Music Group, Warner Music
Group, Sony Music Entertainment and EMI Music--want Spotify to follow
the lead of rivals like Rhapsody and eMusic by introducing premium
monthly subscriptions to U.S. consumers, enabling the music industry to
share in resulting revenues."
- This Could Kill Rhapsody writes David Zax
at Fast Company: "Who stands to lose if Apple enters the subscription
music market? Rhapsody, for one. The leading subscription service now
offers streaming subscription plans for about $10 per month. With
Apple's vast iTunes user base--200 million of them, according to one
analyst and a $1 billion operation just to run--and its legions of
customers who are used to paying for music in its iTunes store, an Apple
subscription service could push Rhapsody to the margins. (We've reached
out to Rhapsody to learn their reaction to the reports, and will update
if we hear back.)"
- Pricing Will Be Key, writes Jacqui Cheng at Ars Technica writes: "The number being tossed around is $10 to $15 per month for the streaming subscription, though a number of details are still left in the air, such as how much music users would be able to access in a month, and for how long. If Apple followed the same model as other subscription services out there, the answers to those questions would be 'unlimited' and "until the subscription is canceled." There's no guarantee it will play out that way, though, as Apple likes to do its own thing."